[Battlemesh] tests update

[Pau]

Hi Benjamin.
Unfortunatelly there was not a babel representative in the WBM so we
just use the default configuration (as most of normal users would do I
supose). Please, find here [1] the babel script we use to configure
it. It would be nice that some babel expert configures it with the
best options (generic for most systems multiradio and single radio).
Feel free to fork the repository, add your changes and push request
them to the organization team.

Cheers

[1] https://github.com/battlemesh/battlemesh-packages
--
./p4u


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Benjamin Henrion <bh at udev.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gio at eigenlab.org> wrote:
>> Froma a very quick look at data seems that BMX6 is the winner
>> while babel is the loser :( the difference is a lot so we have to crosscheck
>> data and configuration to understand what happened...
>
> In your babel config, have you used the -z option to take advantage of
> the dual radios channels?
>
> --
> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
> democratically elected legislators."
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh