[Battlemesh] Battlemesh v6 conclusions

Mitar mitar at tnode.com
Tue Jul 30 08:11:03 UTC 2013


Hi!

There were some measurements done at WCW as well?

How is with all that?

Mitar is really confused here. :-(


Mitar

> There are not "official" results, just raw data. As far as I know Nico and
> Clauz (the testing team) did some initial analisys, which pointed that BMX6
> was the protocol with better results in general followed by OLSR in the
> bandwidth corner-to-corner test and Batman-adv in the time convergence
> test. But maybe they can clarify it.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> --
> ./p4u
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Mitar <mitar at tnode.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>>
>> Maybe I missed, but I cannot find any Battlemesh v6 conclusions/findings
>> anywhere?
>>
>> I found this page:
>>
>> http://www.battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV6/Tests
>>
>> But test data URL does not open for me:
>>
>> http://downloads.battlemesh.org/WBMv6/test_data/
>>
>> But I would in fact be more interested in some nice plots and
>> conclusions based on them, not direct raw data. Has any such analysis
>> been done? So what is current status of comparisons between routing
>> protocols? Where could I learn more about that?
>>
>>
>> Mitar
>>
>> --
>> http://mitar.tnode.com/
>> https://twitter.com/mitar_m
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> 

-- 
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m


More information about the Battlemesh mailing list