[Battlemesh] Code of conduct

[barbara at wlan-si.net]

=)

I had a pedofile example ready, but it'd violate the *code*. =)

The thing is, it's not about control nor order.

I guess, we all agree we'll do our best to prevent any fires from happening. By being considerate ourselves, and by pointing out when someone's playing with matches dangerously.

But a *good manners guide* couldn't do any harm here imho and I think most of us have them implanted by default anyway. 

Let's not forget we can all discuss this together and work together on a proposal that will work for us as a community of open minded and open hearted individuals with good intentions for the whole society. Which can also result in a mutual decision a guide won't be needed in the end. We can put it up for a vote, for example, in every phase.

Warm regards,

Barb

> On 31. jul. 2015, at 14.15, Pedro <pederindi at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Not exactly, Barbara,
> 
> A fire escape is required for institutional and general (public)
> buildings. We can agree that it is useul because there are a lot of
> people (500, 1000), and there is a need of great coordination in few
> time. Low probability of injury, for example 0.001, is one person in
> 1000 people.
> 
> (and now speaking to all)
> 
> In general, rules are applied when there is a notion of "out of
> control", festivals, lot of people coming that you cannot control. But
> I think is not the case.
> 
> Yesterday I checked that Linux Kernel have not unit testes for all the
> kernel, perhaps is the same case with OpenWRT. Oh, we cannot assure
> 100% of quality. We should control everything? (I'm reading the book
> brave new world). We should control everything to assure a 100%
> success of being comfortable and happy? (The other extreme, of course
> not).
> 
> No important previous incidents, just a week, "few" people, close
> community (my first time I go there, but I think is like this). Rules
> make people to get autorepressed. Why to autorepress if nothing bad
> could happen
> 
> (battlemesh v8, so there was a 1, 2, 3, ..., 7).
> 
> Can we continue demonstrating that we don't need the police, order [1]?
> 
> [1] given the circunstances, this is not my general theory of life
> 
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:37 PM, barbara at wlan-si.net
> <barbara at wlan-si.net> wrote:
>> That's close to saying building a fire escape before a fire is reported in the building is not a good policy.
>> 
>> ;)
>> 
>> Barb
>> 
>> On 31. jul. 2015, at 13.29, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> 
>>>> I think, in general, creating restrictions or regulations before any
>>>> problem is reported is not a good policy.
>>> 
>>> Agreed.
>>> 
>>> -- Juliusz
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Battlemesh mailing list
>>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20150731/ed911eeb/attachment-0001.htm>