[Battlemesh] flent tests run?

[Dave Taht]

All the tests show is that adhoc wifi is just as badly broken from a
congestion control perspective as last year, and that achieved rates
were very low also, in the mbit range, in this environment. I am
surprised "real" adhoc networks are working at all.

I do hope that code for the ath10k fq_codel proof of concept

http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/dql_on_wifi_2/

http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/fq_codel_on_ath10k/

arrives on ath9k in time for battlemesh next year.



On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Pau <pau at dabax.net> wrote:
> I run the flest tests, but only for bmx6. We run out of time and in
> addition there was not a big interest on running the testes for more
> protocols. Batman-adv and OLSRv2 got some problems (I don't know if real
> bugs or miss-configurations), and no one took care of Babel.
>
> Find attached the files.
>
> On 08/05/16 18:25, Dave Taht wrote:
>> did the flent test suite get run at this battlemesh?
>>
>> If so, I can tear apart the data from here....
>>
>
> --
> ./p4u
>
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blech.svg
Type: image/svg+xml
Size: 202697 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20160509/cef863dd/attachment-0001.svg>