<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I've lost my keyring, it's like the one in the link http://www.momastore.org/museum/moma/ProductDisplay_MoMA%20Key%20Ring%20Organizer_10451_10001_11647_-1_11536_11541_null_shop_<br>i think i've lost it in the petit zoo.<br>Please say if someone has sawn it!<br>David<br><img src="file:///tmp/moz-screenshot.png" alt=""><br><br>> From: battlemesh-request@ml.ninux.org<br>> Subject: Battlemesh Digest, Vol 12, Issue 37<br>> To: battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:11:15 +0000<br>> <br>> Send Battlemesh mailing list submissions to<br>> battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> <br>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh<br>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>> battlemesh-request@ml.ninux.org<br>> <br>> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>> battlemesh-owner@ml.ninux.org<br>> <br>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> than "Re: Contents of Battlemesh digest..."<br>> <br>> <br>> Today's Topics:<br>> <br>> 1. Re: battlemesh.org down? (ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto))<br>> 2. Some WMBv4 feedbacks (Xavier Carcelle)<br>> 3. Subsignal podcast about WBMv4 (Benjamin Henrion)<br>> 4. Congratulations again for the great WBMv4! (L. Aaron Kaplan)<br>> 5. Re: Some WMBv4 feedbacks (Ryan Hughes)<br>> 6. Re: Some WMBv4 feedbacks (L. Aaron Kaplan)<br>> 7. Re: Congratulations again for the great WBMv4! (Clauz)<br>> 8. Re: Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter (44kbps)<br>> 9. Re: Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter (Albert Homs i Gall)<br>> <br>> <br>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 1<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:10:50 +0100<br>> From: "ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)" <zioproto@gmail.com><br>> Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] battlemesh.org down?<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID:<br>> <AANLkTimUcOJfbuZ1n46+5YJSV2z4a0NX8R6mNnEPD2GP@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>> <br>> I will take care of this.<br>> <br>> Saverio<br>> <br>> <br>> 2011/3/21 Benjamin Henrion <bh@udev.org>:<br>> > Hi,<br>> ><br>> > Battlemesh.org is unreachable from here.<br>> ><br>> > What about at your location?<br>> ><br>> > How can put it backup?<br>> ><br>> > Best,<br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org><br>> > FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403<br>> > "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software<br>> > patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.<br>> > Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of<br>> > software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent<br>> > court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their<br>> > favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or<br>> > democratically elected legislators."<br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Battlemesh mailing list<br>> > Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh<br>> ><br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 2<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:24:41 +0100<br>> From: Xavier Carcelle <xavier.carcelle@gmail.com><br>> Subject: [Battlemesh] Some WMBv4 feedbacks<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID:<br>> <AANLkTim=EE2FtBrhTJPM3joEM7RjQ2Opspfup8CexJ6T@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>> <br>> Querido battlemesh folks,<br>> <br>> Una mas : many thanks to the hosters of this WBMv4 and namely Roger<br>> and the guifi.net team for their hosting. Albert : thanks also for the<br>> pictures and can we use them for communication/press communications ?<br>> <br>> Some (personal) feedbacks from this edition of the battlemesh :<br>> <br>> *More people and coming from more locations. Digging for infos /<br>> workshops / tutorials on mesh/wireless procotols/devices<br>> *More talks and presentations (leading to less hands-on wireless<br>> battle) to exchange on the different issues and works done by the<br>> different communities<br>> *Needs for more organizations on the deployment/tests parts (as usual)<br>> and I propose 2 teams for next editions :<br>> **configuration/flashing team (w/ a workshop right at the beginning of<br>> the event for configuring the different protocols) ready to deploy the<br>> 2nd day (needs for map of the location, flashing server)<br>> **tests teams : working in advance preparing scripts, scenarii, VoIP<br>> server, streaming server ready to be used once mesh-es deployed<br>> ->screen showing the deployment and the different mesh nodes like<br>> during the first one in Paris to follow the tests.<br>> *Maybe dedicated workshops for more visibility on configuration of the<br>> different protocols rather than some in-official meetings/school for<br>> one protocol<br>> *Presence of wifi hardware vendors, IETF people ? formal invitation earlier.<br>> <br>> I enjoyed this event again and want mesh everywhere now :)<br>> <br>> Xavi-massoud. (catalan nick for Xavier:)<br>> PS : Albert, do you have the family pictures from the last day ?<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 3<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:08:02 +0100<br>> From: Benjamin Henrion <bh@udev.org><br>> Subject: [Battlemesh] Subsignal podcast about WBMv4<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID:<br>> <AANLkTik0tmmxAwORDgKqvK6JkoGXj+zdTTkw_6zxoeHG@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>> <br>> The podcast about WBMv4 is here:<br>> <br>> http://signal.hackerspaces.org/archive/2011-03-17-2200-dev-random.ogg<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org><br>> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403<br>> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software<br>> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.<br>> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of<br>> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent<br>> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their<br>> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or<br>> democratically elected legislators."<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 4<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:55:07 +0100<br>> From: "L. Aaron Kaplan" <aaron@lo-res.org><br>> Subject: [Battlemesh] Congratulations again for the great WBMv4!<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID: <8AF1EE55-B932-465F-8B51-3ED39869DFC8@lo-res.org><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> Hi!<br>> <br>> Just wanted to express my big thanks to Roger and Albert for organizing such a great event!<br>> While we did not get to testing protocols very much, it was nevertheless a great<br>> experience to meet and talk with so many talented people in the field!<br>> <br>> Way to go! You set the mark very high for the next WBM :)<br>> <br>> Aaron.<br>> <br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>> Name: PGP.sig<br>> Type: application/pgp-signature<br>> Size: 194 bytes<br>> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>> URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/0452e53c/attachment-0001.pgp><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 5<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:08:33 -0400 (EDT)<br>> From: Ryan Hughes <ryan@iheartryan.com><br>> Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Some WMBv4 feedbacks<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103211007590.17935@minime><br>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed<br>> <br>> > *Presence of wifi hardware vendors, IETF people ? formal invitation earlier.<br>> <br>> For my purposes, I was glad that this was a pretty commercial-free <br>> environment. I got to hear frank and open reviews of the available <br>> hardware.<br>> <br>> Of course, my purposes may be different from other people's. I don't have <br>> a network yet and am trying to start it up. For people that have <br>> networks already, they might want the vendors there, so that we can talk <br>> to them about what we would like to see from their future hardware. <br>> Particularly, we all would've benefited if hardware vendors were there to <br>> hear the discussion of bufferbloat.<br>> <br>> That's my 0,02 Euros.<br>> <br>> --Ryan<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 6<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:37:58 +0100<br>> From: "L. Aaron Kaplan" <aaron@lo-res.org><br>> Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Some WMBv4 feedbacks<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID: <A8F772D9-ED83-4A0B-A42C-38A60B83DB47@lo-res.org><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>> <br>> <br>> On Mar 21, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Xavier Carcelle wrote:<br>> <br>> > Querido battlemesh folks,<br>> > <br>> > Una mas : many thanks to the hosters of this WBMv4 and namely Roger<br>> > and the guifi.net team for their hosting. Albert : thanks also for the<br>> > pictures and can we use them for communication/press communications ?<br>> > <br>> > Some (personal) feedbacks from this edition of the battlemesh :<br>> > <br>> > *More people and coming from more locations. Digging for infos /<br>> > workshops / tutorials on mesh/wireless procotols/devices<br>> > *More talks and presentations (leading to less hands-on wireless<br>> > battle) to exchange on the different issues and works done by the<br>> > different communities<br>> > *Needs for more organizations on the deployment/tests parts (as usual)<br>> > and I propose 2 teams for next editions :<br>> > **configuration/flashing team (w/ a workshop right at the beginning of<br>> > the event for configuring the different protocols) ready to deploy the<br>> > 2nd day (needs for map of the location, flashing server)<br>> > **tests teams : working in advance preparing scripts, scenarii, VoIP<br>> > server, streaming server ready to be used once mesh-es deployed<br>> > ->screen showing the deployment and the different mesh nodes like<br>> > during the first one in Paris to follow the tests.<br>> > *Maybe dedicated workshops for more visibility on configuration of the<br>> > different protocols rather than some in-official meetings/school for<br>> > one protocol<br>> <br>> ACK to all above!<br>> <br>> > *Presence of wifi hardware vendors, IETF people ? formal invitation earlier.<br>> <br>> I will be at the IETF next week. If you want, I can describe the WBM<br>> and invite people over to the next WBM.<br>> <br>> > <br>> > I enjoyed this event again and want mesh everywhere now :)<br>> > <br>> hehe :)<br>> <br>> Yeah!<br>> <br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>> Name: PGP.sig<br>> Type: application/pgp-signature<br>> Size: 194 bytes<br>> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>> URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/e483e736/attachment-0001.pgp><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 7<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:14:10 +0100<br>> From: Clauz <clauz@ninux.org><br>> Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Congratulations again for the great WBMv4!<br>> To: battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> Message-ID: <4D878762.1020007@ninux.org><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> <br>> On 03/21/2011 02:55 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan wrote:<br>> > Hi!<br>> > <br>> > Just wanted to express my big thanks to Roger and Albert for organizing such a great event!<br>> > While we did not get to testing protocols very much, it was nevertheless a great<br>> > experience to meet and talk with so many talented people in the field!<br>> > <br>> > Way to go! You set the mark very high for the next WBM :)<br>> <br>> Yes, thanks to all the guifi folks that hosted us, to Marek for taking<br>> care of the agenda, to Pieter that drove a lot to pick up people, and<br>> everybody else who worked in the shadow...<br>> <br>> I am really happy about this awesome international community that we<br>> have been able to build!<br>> <br>> gracies,<br>> Clauz<br>> <br>> <br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>> Name: signature.asc<br>> Type: application/pgp-signature<br>> Size: 262 bytes<br>> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>> URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/2fbcae98/attachment-0001.pgp><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 8<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:07:04 +0100<br>> From: 44kbps <44kbps@gmail.com><br>> Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID:<br>> <AANLkTints7YC=jmmPSsVtRR6-WPEzWqqvSo-cU3-uwer@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> <br>> I was talking to his owner. He said to email to guifi.net mailist. Still no<br>> response. I forgot to leave it on SBG and now a I is it on Olot.<br>> In the other way I foget my two 220Vx6 on somewhere...<br>> <br>> On 2011 3 21 11:15, "Roger Baig Vi?as" <roger.baig@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> Does anybody take care of giving this back to the owner?<br>> <br>> thx<br>> <br>> <br>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Andrew Parnell <andrew@parnell.ca> wrote:<br>> > I have it here at Can ...<br>> --<br>> roger<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Battlemesh mailing list<br>> Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> http...<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/125055ca/attachment-0001.htm><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 9<br>> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:12:39 +0100<br>> From: Albert Homs i Gall <alberthoms@gmail.com><br>> Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter<br>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org><br>> Message-ID:<br>> <AANLkTinR012PxCC41kb=d-6BYO+aDgOrNXxx4pXLFSFG@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> <br>> Yesterday during dinner talked to andrew to give the adapter to Pau, and<br>> mailed the owner to coordinate with pau to get i back. After all the<br>> messages I really don't know who has it :S. I will suppose tthat everything<br>> is working like we said during the dinner<br>> <br>> 2011/3/21 44kbps <44kbps@gmail.com><br>> <br>> > I was talking to his owner. He said to email to guifi.net mailist. Still<br>> > no response. I forgot to leave it on SBG and now a I is it on Olot.<br>> > In the other way I foget my two 220Vx6 on somewhere...<br>> ><br>> > On 2011 3 21 11:15, "Roger Baig Vi?as" <roger.baig@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > Does anybody take care of giving this back to the owner?<br>> ><br>> > thx<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Andrew Parnell <andrew@parnell.ca> wrote:<br>> > > I have it here at Can ...<br>> > --<br>> > roger<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Battlemesh mailing list<br>> > Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> > http...<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Battlemesh mailing list<br>> > Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh<br>> ><br>> ><br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/3a3f586f/attachment.htm><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Battlemesh mailing list<br>> Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org<br>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh<br>> <br>> <br>> End of Battlemesh Digest, Vol 12, Issue 37<br>> ******************************************<br> </body>
</html>