<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Benjamin Henrion <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bh@udev.org" target="_blank">bh@udev.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <<a href="mailto:jch@pps.jussieu.fr">jch@pps.jussieu.fr</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> It's a protocol for communicating with radios over Ethernet.<br>
><br>
>> But most of all, it allows the routers to be virtualised!<br>
<br>
</div>Simulating a wifi environnement is pretty hard.<br></blockquote><div>we do NOT do this! </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
So I do not believe in virtualisation for wifi.<br></blockquote><div>its not a "completely" virtual wifi,..</div><div><br></div><div>its just virtually moving a real and existing wifi interface from one device to another,. (or if needed to multiple ones)<br>
so in theory it could offer all meta-informations and configuration interfaces a local wifi can offer, just with some added latency.</div><div><br></div><div>but yes you can not do driver development on it</div></div>