<br clear="all"><div>--<br>./p4u<br></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Clauz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clauz@ninux.org" target="_blank">clauz@ninux.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi!<br>
I'll try to reply inline.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On 07/29/2013 12:11 PM, Pau wrote:<br>
> There are not "official" results, just raw data. As far as I know Nico<br>
> and Clauz (the testing team) did some initial analisys, which pointed<br>
> that BMX6 was the protocol with better results in general followed by<br>
> OLSR in the bandwidth corner-to-corner test and Batman-adv in the time<br>
> convergence test. But maybe they can clarify it.<br>
<br>
</div>Well, this, at least from my side, was just a sensation from looking at<br>
the screen while the tests where performed, so it's not too fair to make<br>
any big claim before having a real analysis done on the data.<br><div class="im"></div></blockquote><div><br>Ok! However I remember Nico did some python script which already showed some results (at least in the bandwith test).<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Mitar <<a href="mailto:mitar@tnode.com">mitar@tnode.com</a><br>
</div><div class="im">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mitar@tnode.com">mitar@tnode.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi!<br>
><br>
> Maybe I missed, but I cannot find any Battlemesh v6 conclusions/findings<br>
> anywhere?<br>
><br>
> I found this page:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV6/Tests" target="_blank">http://www.battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV6/Tests</a><br>
><br>
> But test data URL does not open for me:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://downloads.battlemesh.org/WBMv6/test_data/" target="_blank">http://downloads.battlemesh.org/WBMv6/test_data/</a><br>
<br>
</div>Yes, it was down, it didn't survive the summer heatwave in Rome, but now<br>
it should be up again. I also uploaded the data to github:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/cl4u2/battlemeshv6_tests_postprocessing" target="_blank">https://github.com/cl4u2/battlemeshv6_tests_postprocessing</a><br>
<div class="im"><br>
> But I would in fact be more interested in some nice plots and<br>
> conclusions based on them, not direct raw data. Has any such analysis<br>
> been done? So what is current status of comparisons between routing<br>
> protocols? Where could I learn more about that?<br>
<br>
</div>For battlemesh v6 the analysis hasn't been done yet.<br></blockquote><div><br>It means volunteers are welcome! :)<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
cheers,<br>
Clauz<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Battlemesh mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org">Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
<a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>