<br clear="all"><div>--<br>./p4u<br></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Mitar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mitar@tnode.com" target="_blank">mitar@tnode.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi!<br>
<br>
There were some measurements done at WCW as well?<br></blockquote><div><br>Yes, we did some mesurements. The testbed here was mainly composed by TPlink MR3040 single radio routers (maybe UFO have some map screenshots).<br>
<br>We used the firmware developed during the battlemesh (which split protocols by VLAN tag) and we capture all traffic between the testing node and the mesh network using WireShark. The graph you can see here is the result of the overhead-moving test:<br>
<br><a href="https://libre-mesh.org/attachments/download/12/overhead_mobile.png">https://libre-mesh.org/attachments/download/12/overhead_mobile.png</a><br><br>There was another experiment to measure the coverage time but we did something wrong in the capture and the graphic made not sense. However the impression was that Batman-adv was better on this.<br>
<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
How is with all that?<br>
<br>
Mitar is really confused here. :-(<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Mitar<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
> There are not "official" results, just raw data. As far as I know Nico and<br>
> Clauz (the testing team) did some initial analisys, which pointed that BMX6<br>
> was the protocol with better results in general followed by OLSR in the<br>
> bandwidth corner-to-corner test and Batman-adv in the time convergence<br>
> test. But maybe they can clarify it.<br>
><br>
> Cheers<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> ./p4u<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Mitar <<a href="mailto:mitar@tnode.com">mitar@tnode.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hi!<br>
>><br>
>> Maybe I missed, but I cannot find any Battlemesh v6 conclusions/findings<br>
>> anywhere?<br>
>><br>
>> I found this page:<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="http://www.battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV6/Tests" target="_blank">http://www.battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV6/Tests</a><br>
>><br>
>> But test data URL does not open for me:<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="http://downloads.battlemesh.org/WBMv6/test_data/" target="_blank">http://downloads.battlemesh.org/WBMv6/test_data/</a><br>
>><br>
>> But I would in fact be more interested in some nice plots and<br>
>> conclusions based on them, not direct raw data. Has any such analysis<br>
>> been done? So what is current status of comparisons between routing<br>
>> protocols? Where could I learn more about that?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Mitar<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> <a href="http://mitar.tnode.com/" target="_blank">http://mitar.tnode.com/</a><br>
>> <a href="https://twitter.com/mitar_m" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/mitar_m</a><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Battlemesh mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org">Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Battlemesh mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org">Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh</a><br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
<a href="http://mitar.tnode.com/" target="_blank">http://mitar.tnode.com/</a><br>
<a href="https://twitter.com/mitar_m" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/mitar_m</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Battlemesh mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org">Battlemesh@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
<a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>