[Nodeshot] Refactoring doubt: device fields firmware and OS

[Fabio Capriati]

In my opinion, it could be righta a table "Firmware" with this fields:

Integer "ID"
String "Operative System"   (OperWRT | MicrotiKOS | AirOS)
String "Name" (Stock | Sburratone | Scorreggione)
Integer "Version"
Bool "Support IPV6"
Bool "Support SNMP"
Bool ....

So into device you can put only the ID reference.






2013/11/6 Stefano De Carlo <stefanauss at gmail.com>

> Il 06/11/2013 14:00, nemesis ha scritto:
> >
> > In the Device table at the moment we have "os" which stands for
> > "operating system" and "firmware", both are optional fields.
> >
> > Does it have sense to have both? Or in case of embedded device the OS
> > field should be filled with the firmware name?
> >
> > Have your say
>
> In my experience I think It's best not to have semantic clashes like
> this one and just go for an agnostic term. "Operating System" will work
> just fine for the whole device spectrum.
>
> Stefanauss.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nodeshot mailing list
> Nodeshot at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/nodeshot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/nodeshot/attachments/20131106/2cad85a9/attachment-0001.html>