Io ho due Router Adsl "Alice Gate 2 Plus Wi-Fi"<span class="CentraTotale"> (non hanno più il firmware originale)<br><br><a href="http://aiuto.alice.it/informazioni/modemadsl/alice_gate2adv.html">http://aiuto.alice.it/informazioni/modemadsl/alice_gate2adv.html</a></span><br>
<br>Purtroppo stasera non potrò venire in riunione, alla prox riunione li porto per provare a metterci le mani.<br><br>Ciao<br>Marco<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/9 Claudio <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:claudyus84@gmail.com">claudyus84@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">A proposito di modem alice. Qualcuno ha già provato a caricarci<br>
openwrt? Funziona?<br>
I modelli qua riportati sono ancora attuali o già obsoleti?<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: <<a href="mailto:openwrt-commits@openwrt.org">openwrt-commits@openwrt.org</a>><br>
Date: 2009/6/9<br>
Subject: [OpenWrt-Commits] r16393 - in trunk:<br>
target/linux/brcm63xx/files/drivers/mtd/maps<br>
target/linux/brcm63xx/files/include/asm-mips/mach-bcm63xx<br>
target/linux/brcm63xx/image tools/firmware-utils<br>
tools/firmware-utils/src<br>
To: <a href="mailto:openwrt-commits@lists.openwrt.org">openwrt-commits@lists.openwrt.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Author: florian<br>
Date: 2009-06-09 10:04:52 +0200 (Tue, 09 Jun 2009)<br>
New Revision: 16393<br>
<br>
Added:<br>
trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/README.images-bcm63xx<br>
<CUT><br>
Added: trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/README.images-bcm63xx<br>
===================================================================<br>
--- trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/README.images-bcm63xx<br>
(rev 0)<br>
+++ trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/README.images-bcm63xx<br>
2009-06-09 08:04:52 UTC (rev 16393)<br>
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@<br>
+The image neede to flash onto a Broadcom 63xx-series board depends on the<br>
+board, method you are using to flash, and, for web-based flash, on the version<br>
+of the Broadcom code your router uses.<br>
+<br>
+There are two major revisions of the Broadcom code as far as imagetags are<br>
+concerned, before 3.08 and after 3.08, however there are some variations<br>
+within in that, either due to vendor differences or due to changes at<br>
+Broadcom (it's not clear yet which is the case). In addtion Pirelli modified<br>
+the Broadcom code, so Alice Gate models use a different imagetag than any<br>
+other vendor.<br>
+<br>
+The imagetag format for flashing via CFE is the same for almost all the<br>
+boards, and is the same for all images generated by the imagetag utility.<br>
+Images flashable using cfe are labelled openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-cfe.bin<br>
+<br>
+The imagetags for tftp/ftp flashing is based on Broadcom 3.00-3.04 imagetags<br>
+and is known to be correct as the source code GPL and is available for reading.<br>
+<br>
+Broadcom 3.00-3.02 flashing has been tested on Comtrend CT-5261, CT-536 and<br>
+Tecom GW6000, and is the version of the flashing that was present before the<br>
+imagetags were split by broadcom code version (early June 2009)<br>
+<br>
+3.04 is guessed to be the same as 3.00-3.02 based on available information<br>
+<br>
+Broadom 3.06 is thought to be the same as 3.00-3.02, however the only 3.06<br>
+this author (Daniel Dickinson) has seen is the Alice Gate (Pirelli) firmware<br>
+which is known to be different due to vendor (Pirelli) modifications to the<br>
+Broadcom code.<br>
+<br>
+Broadcom 3.08 introduced changes to the imagetag to deal with TR69 (a remote<br>
+router management system developed by the DSL Forum). The version we are<br>
+using as 3.08 is based on the BT Voyager firmware image I looked at. It may<br>
+in fact be BT Voyager-specific, and may in fact not be 3.08, but modified 3.06<br>
+and not apply to all 3.08 versions.<br>
+<br>
+Broadcom 3.10 uses an imagetag that is believed to apply to all 3.10 and 3.12<br>
+versions, and has been tested on the Tecom GW6200. It is similar to 3.08.<br>
+There is a field for vendor-specific information, that at least in some cases<br>
+is not optional. It is based on the hexedit of a neufbox4 firmware image, the<br>
+information in <a href="https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4987" target="_blank">https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4987</a>, and the hexedit of a Tecom<br>
+GW6200 image.<br>
+<br>
+Some boards share the same tag format, but require vendor-specific fields in<br>
+the board. In that case the tagid is shared, but the filename of the generated<br>
+image reflects the router for which the image was created.<br>
+<br>
+router |method| codever |tagid |filename<br>
++----------+------+---------+------+-------------------------------------------<br>
+|any |cfe | any |bccfe |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bccfe-cfe.bin<br>
+|any |t/ftp | any |bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+| |web |3.00-3.06|bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+| |web |3.08 |bc308 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc308-cfe.bin<br>
+| |web |3.10-3.12|bc310 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc310-cfe.bin<br>
+|CT536 |web |3.02 |bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+|CT5621 |web |3.02 |bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+|GW6000 |web |3.00 |bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+|USR9108? |web |? |bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+|USR9108? |web |? |bc310 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc310-cfe.bin<br>
+|DG834GT |web |3.02 |bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+|V2500V |web |3.08 |bc308 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-btvgr-cfe.bin<br>
+|GW6200 |web |3.10 |bc310 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-gw6200-cfe.bin<br>
+|Neufbox4 |web |3.12 |bc310 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-nb4-cfe.bin<br>
+|F@ST2404 |web |? |bc300 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc300-cfe.bin<br>
+|F@ST2404 |web |? |bc310 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-bc310-cfe.bin<br>
+|AGVoIP2+Wi|web |alice3.06|ag306 |openwrt-<board>-<filesystem>-agv2+w-cfe.bin<br>
+<br>
+Old imagetag routers<br>
+--------------------<br>
+Davolink DV201AMR<br>
+<br>
+Redboot routers<br>
+---------------<br>
+Inventel Livebox<br>
+<br>
+Known router->code versions<br>
+---------------------------<br>
+<br>
+Vendor |Model |Code Ver<br>
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+--------<br>
+Comtrend |CT-5261 |3.02<br>
+Comtrend |CT-536 |3.02<br>
+Tecom |GW6000 |3.00<br>
+Tecom |GW6200 |3.10<br>
+Pirelli |Alice Gate Wi-Fi (+VoIP models?) |ag 3.06<br>
+? |TD-88xx |3.06<br>
+BT |Voyager V2500V |3.08 (?)<br>
+Belkin |F5D7633 |3.10<br>
+Neuf ? |Neufbox 4 |3.12<br>
+NetGear |DG834GT<br>
|3.02<br>
+Sagem |F@ST2404 |?<br>
+USR |9108 |?<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wireless mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
<a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>