piu' che ath9k sembra un problema ath9k + hostap.... stiamo a vedere come evolvono le cose.<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">si ho gia' aperto un bug da tempo per il VAP<br>
<br>
ma sembra che al momento e' proprio al modalita' AP che ha bisogno di<br>
essere stabilizzata su ath9k dopo di che probabilmente aggiusteranno<br>
anche i VAP<br>
<br>
2011/3/23 Antonio Anselmi <<a href="mailto:tony.anselmi@gmail.com">tony.anselmi@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> funziona su M5... quello che manca e' la possibilita' di avere un simultaneo<br>
> VAP in managed :(<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
>> From: Ben West <<a href="mailto:westbywest@gmail.com">westbywest@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> Date: 2011/3/22<br>
>> Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on<br>
>> Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode?<br>
>> To: "Daniel A. Nagy" <<a href="mailto:nagydani@epointsystem.org">nagydani@epointsystem.org</a>><br>
>> Cc: <a href="mailto:olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> For an update, I believe I was able to get HT modes working in IBSS<br>
>> (aka adhoc) on two Nanostation M5s. The Links reported 150Mbit/s<br>
>> connection on both ends after settling, and throughput measured at<br>
>> 45Mbit/s.<br>
>> This required patches to iw and compat-wireless on OpenWRT r25206.<br>
>> More info here:<br>
>> <a href="https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=131299#p131299" target="_blank">https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=131299#p131299</a><br>
>> I would be interested to hear if anyone has been able to specify HT<br>
>> modes in /etc/config/wireless on OpenWRT, since I was unable.<br>
>> Note that the link speeds did suggest I was getting multiple chains<br>
>> (i.e. MIMO) very briefly. My test environment (indoor room, 20feet<br>
>> separation) could have been non-ideal.<br>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Ben West <<a href="mailto:me@benwest.name">me@benwest.name</a>> wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Sorry for not explaining this in the original post. It is described in<br>
>> > OpenWRT forum post; I had snipped my question to this list to focus on<br>
>> > mesh-related question.<br>
>> > Gateway: Rocket M5, flashed with pre-compiled<br>
>> > openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-rocket-m-squashfs-factory.bin for Backfire 10.03-rc4<br>
>> > Repeaters (and a backup gwy): Nanostation M5, flashed with<br>
>> > custom-compiled pre-compiled openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-factory.bin<br>
>> > from Backfire r24045, and with this patch to allow DHCP on 2nd LAN port:<br>
>> > <a href="http://freifunk.net/pipermail/wlanware/2010-December/002439.html" target="_blank">http://freifunk.net/pipermail/wlanware/2010-December/002439.html</a><br>
>> > Basically, I'm curious to hear details (e.g. patches, what revision of<br>
>> > OpenWRT/ath9k) where people have confirmed getting HT modes to work.<br>
>> > Besides that, these nodes are actually working just fine, and their link<br>
>> > speed generally outpaces the uplink I have for them anyway. It's just that<br>
>> > I would like to support ~40Mbit link speed in the intermediate future,<br>
>> > should a fast enough uplink appear.<br>
>> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Daniel A. Nagy<br>
>> > <<a href="mailto:nagydani@epointsystem.org">nagydani@epointsystem.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On 03/14/2011 06:10 AM, Ben West wrote:<br>
>> >> > I just set up 3 Ubiquiti M5 devices as mesh nodes running OpenWRT<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Since Ubiquiti M5 devices are not as identical as the pre-M series,<br>
>> >> could you be more specific?<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> These three categories are quite distinct, require different firmware<br>
>> >> and have their own, distinct quirks:<br>
>> >> - PicoStation / Bullet M5<br>
>> >> - NanoStation M5<br>
>> >> - NanoStation M5 Loco<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Cheers,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> Daniel<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> Olsr-users mailing list<br>
>> >> <a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>
>> >> <a href="http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users" target="_blank">http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</a><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Ben West<br>
>> <a href="mailto:westbywest@gmail.com">westbywest@gmail.com</a><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Olsr-users mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users" target="_blank">http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</a><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>