Quello che va meglio :) <br>Ce ne saranno una dozzina nel kernel, aggiungili.<br>Così, a naso, vista la natura particolare del canale, un algo abbastanza tollerante alle perdite/timeout.<br>Ma questo solo per capire sa cambia qualcosa o siamo sempre con gli stessi valori..<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 14:23, Gioacchino Mazzurco <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>></span> ha scritto:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
non so quale usa di default tu quale mi consigli di usare?<br>
<br>
Il 03 luglio 2011 14:18, Darkman <<a href="mailto:darkman@darkman.it">darkman@darkman.it</a>> ha scritto:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> Bene, ora puoi ripetere le prove cambiando l'algoritmo di controllo di<br>
> congestione sul client iperf.<br>
> Cosa stai usando ora? Reno?<br>
><br>
> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 14:09, Gioacchino Mazzurco <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
> ha scritto:<br>
>><br>
>> altri test fissando la quantita'<br>
>><br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-62.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 270 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-55.3 sec 2.00 MBytes 304 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-64.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 261 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-58.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 285 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-99.6 sec 2.00 MBytes 169 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-96.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 174 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-89.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 187 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-66.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 253 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-99.9 sec 2.00 MBytes 161 Kbits/sec<br>
>> [ 4] 0.0-88.1 sec 2.00 MBytes 190 Kbits/sec<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:57, Gioacchino Mazzurco <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>> ha<br>
>> scritto:<br>
>> > senza tinc la configurazione rimane uguale ma il traffico al posto di<br>
>> > passare dal tunnel via internet passa solo attraverso i link wireless<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Il 03 luglio 2011 13:51, Antonio Quartulli <<a href="mailto:ordex@autistici.org">ordex@autistici.org</a>> ha<br>
>> > scritto:<br>
>> >> On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 01:48:37 +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:<br>
>> >>> il test e' sempre PC( iperf -c ) <-- cavo lan --> Piconstation (<br>
>> >>> btman-adv + tinc )<-- tinc ---> PC( batman-adv + tinc + iperf -s)<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> anche senza TINC la configurazione rimane uguale? scusa ma non ho<br>
>> >> capito<br>
>> >> questo daalle mail precedenti<br>
>> >><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> >usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo<br>
>> >>> >deviati..<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> quei test non sono fatti in parallelo sono fatti in modo sequenziale<br>
>> >>> quindi volta per volta c'e' ne e' attivo solo uno<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:40, Darkman <<a href="mailto:darkman@darkman.it">darkman@darkman.it</a>> ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> > Magari se scegliessi un test "unico" sarebbe anche meglio,<br>
>> >>> > usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo<br>
>> >>> > deviati..<br>
>> >>> > Se non mi dicessi della CPU a palla, guardando sta roba ti direi che<br>
>> >>> > è<br>
>> >>> > congestione..<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:31, Gioacchino Mazzurco<br>
>> >>> > <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >>> > ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> altra serie di test<br>
>> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.8 sec 384 KBytes 167 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.5 sec 384 KBytes 180 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.0 sec 384 KBytes 157 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.1 sec 384 KBytes 149 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-32.3 sec 384 KBytes 97.3 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.8 sec 384 KBytes 151 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-27.7 sec 256 KBytes 75.8 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.8 sec 256 KBytes 96.3 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.3 sec 512 KBytes 294 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.0 sec 512 KBytes 299 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-37.6 sec 512 KBytes 112 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.7 sec 512 KBytes 224 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.3 sec 384 KBytes 148 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.9 sec 640 KBytes 293 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-24.8 sec 512 KBytes 169 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-16.4 sec 384 KBytes 192 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.4 sec 384 KBytes 147 Kbits/sec<br>
>> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> ho spento dnsmasq che non serviva a niente e andiamo di poco ma<br>
>> >>> >> meglio<br>
>> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:16, Darkman <<a href="mailto:darkman@darkman.it">darkman@darkman.it</a>> ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> > Il sintomo è abbastanza chiaro, ma dubito sia colpa della CPU o<br>
>> >>> >> > meglio,<br>
>> >>> >> > secondo me qualcosa<br>
>> >>> >> > è stata scritta male, 100Kbps sono davvero ridicoli. A maggior<br>
>> >>> >> > ragione<br>
>> >>> >> > quando ste cpu hanno anche qualche set dedicato<br>
>> >>> >> > alla crittografia simmetrica...<br>
>> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:04, Gioacchino Mazzurco<br>
>> >>> >> > <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >>> >> > ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> ma il problema sembra proprio l'eccessivo utilizzo di cpu per la<br>
>> >>> >> >> vpn<br>
>> >>> >> >> perche' stando in ssh sulla picostation mentre c'e' traffico che<br>
>> >>> >> >> passa<br>
>> >>> >> >> sulla vpn diventa completamente unresponsive non sente nemmeno<br>
>> >>> >> >> ctrl+c<br>
>> >>> >> >> sulla shell... quando il traffico finisce mi esegue tutto quello<br>
>> >>> >> >> che<br>
>> >>> >> >> gli avevo mandato nel fratempo<br>
>> >>> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:01, Gioacchino Mazzurco<br>
>> >>> >> >> <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>> ha<br>
>> >>> >> >> scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> PC)?<br>
>> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> > dovrei installarmi anche batman-adv sul pc...<br>
>> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 12:58, Darkman <<a href="mailto:darkman@darkman.it">darkman@darkman.it</a>> ha<br>
>> >>> >> >> > scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> E' chiaro che non può essere il tuo upstream,<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> ma sei certo che il collo di bottiglia non sia nella capacità<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> di sta<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> rete<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> mesh tunnellata?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> Hai provato a lanciare 2 iperf in parallelo?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> PC)?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:34, Gioacchino Mazzurco<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >> ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> la picostation a e la z sono la stessa picostation... dalla<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> picostation a posso decidere se accendere tinc e quindi far<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> passare<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> traffico mesh su internet oppure se usare solo i link<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> wireless<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> dal computer pocco decidere sia di usare la picostation come<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> gw sia<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> di<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> usare il router adsl<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> le casistiche quindi sono 3<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via internet senza tinc >500KB/s<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh senza tinc ~ 20Kb/s<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh tunnellata su internet con tinc ~100Kb/s<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:27, Darkman <<a href="mailto:darkman@darkman.it">darkman@darkman.it</a>> ha<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > Fammi capire:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > - tra le tua pico(A) e quella(Z) con l'adsl ci sono<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > diversi nodi<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > e<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > con<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > iperf<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > hai risultati di 20Kbps (A->Z) in L3 puro ? Mentre se usi<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > tinc va<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > a<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > 100Kbps?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > - chi sono gli end-point tinc?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:12, Gioacchino Mazzurco<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> senza tinc praticamente non c'e' connettivita' ( a volte<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> va ma<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> roba<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> tipo 20k perche' sono un sacco di op alcuni dei quali<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> fanno<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> schifo...)<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> se invece faccio iperf passando per internet senza tinc<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ottengo<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> risultati sempre sopra i 500KB/s<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:01, Darkman <<a href="mailto:darkman@darkman.it">darkman@darkman.it</a>> ha<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Hai gia controllato i valori tra le 2 pico con e senza<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > tinc?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:45, Gioacchino Mazzurco<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> iperf -c su computer che usa una picostation come<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> gateway -><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Picostation con tinc <- adsl 8 megabit -> iperf<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --server su<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> <a href="http://eigenlab.org" target="_blank">eigenlab.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 11:33, Darkman <<a href="mailto:darkman@darkman.it">darkman@darkman.it</a>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ha<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > 100kbps mi pare davvero troppo poco anche per quelle<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > cessonanocpu.<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Come li hai ottenuti sti valori?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:10, Gioacchino Mazzurco<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:gmazzurco89@gmail.com">gmazzurco89@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > ha scritto:<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Ciao a tutti!<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Facendo dei test mi sono accorto che le vpn con<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> tinc<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> installato<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> sui<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> nodi ci vanno max a 100k anche se la banda<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> dell'adsl e'<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> molta<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> di<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu'... ho cominciato a cercare ed ho letto che la<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> causa<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e'<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> probabilmente la CPU che non ce la fa a fare<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> decryption<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu' velocemente di cosi'<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> leggendo il man di tinc ho trovato questo<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Cipher = cipher (blowfish)<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> The symmetric cipher algorithm used to<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encrypt<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> UDP<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packets. Any cipher supported by OpenSSL is<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> recognised.<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Furâ€<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> thermore, specifying "none" will turn<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> off<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packet<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption. It is best to use only those ciphers<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> which<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> support<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> CBC mode.<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> mettendo none dovrebbe essere disabilitata l'<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption e<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> quindi<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> avere piu' banda, il meccanismo degli host con il<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> file con<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> la<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> chiave<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> pubblica continua a funzionare disabilitando la<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cifratura,<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> soprattutto bastera' aggiungere quell'opzione li<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> oppure<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> bisogna<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cambiare altre conf?<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> > <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >>><br>
>> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> >> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> >> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> >> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> >><br>
>> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> > <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> > <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> ><br>
>> >>> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> >> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> >> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> >> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> >><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> > Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> > <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> > <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >>> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >>> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> Antonio Quartulli<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> ..each of us alone is worth nothing..<br>
>> >> Ernesto "Che" Guevara<br>
>> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> >> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> >> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Wireless mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Wireless mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wireless mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wireless@ml.ninux.org">Wireless@ml.ninux.org</a><br>
<a href="http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless" target="_blank">http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>