[Battlemesh] i've lost my keyring

Tue Mar 22 12:33:07 CET 2011

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, david gigli <davidgigli at hotmail.it> wrote:
>
> I've lost my keyring, it's like the one in the link http://www.momastore.org/museum/moma/ProductDisplay_MoMA%20Key%20Ring%20Organizer_10451_10001_11647_-1_11536_11541_null_shop_
> i think i've lost it in the petit zoo.
> Please say if someone has sawn it!

We checked almost everything yesterday morning before leaving and we
didn't find it. You could contact directly the resort staff [1].

[1] http://canroca.cat

thx

> David
>
>
> > From: battlemesh-request at ml.ninux.org
> > Subject: Battlemesh Digest, Vol 12, Issue 37
> > To: battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:11:15 +0000
> >
> > Send Battlemesh mailing list submissions to
> > battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > battlemesh-request at ml.ninux.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > battlemesh-owner at ml.ninux.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Battlemesh digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: battlemesh.org down? (ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto))
> > 2. Some WMBv4 feedbacks (Xavier Carcelle)
> > 3. Subsignal podcast about WBMv4 (Benjamin Henrion)
> > 4. Congratulations again for the great WBMv4! (L. Aaron Kaplan)
> > 5. Re: Some WMBv4 feedbacks (Ryan Hughes)
> > 6. Re: Some WMBv4 feedbacks (L. Aaron Kaplan)
> > 7. Re: Congratulations again for the great WBMv4! (Clauz)
> > 8. Re: Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter (44kbps)
> > 9. Re: Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter (Albert Homs i Gall)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:10:50 +0100
> > From: "ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)" <zioproto at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] battlemesh.org down?
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <AANLkTimUcOJfbuZ1n46+5YJSV2z4a0NX8R6mNnEPD2GP at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > I will take care of this.
> >
> > Saverio
> >
> >
> > 2011/3/21 Benjamin Henrion <bh at udev.org>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Battlemesh.org is unreachable from here.
> > >
> > > What about at your location?
> > >
> > > How can put it backup?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
> > > FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
> > > "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
> > > patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
> > > Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
> > > software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
> > > court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
> > > favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
> > > democratically elected legislators."
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Battlemesh mailing list
> > > Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:24:41 +0100
> > From: Xavier Carcelle <xavier.carcelle at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [Battlemesh] Some WMBv4 feedbacks
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <AANLkTim=EE2FtBrhTJPM3joEM7RjQ2Opspfup8CexJ6T at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Querido battlemesh folks,
> >
> > Una mas : many thanks to the hosters of this WBMv4 and namely Roger
> > and the guifi.net team for their hosting. Albert : thanks also for the
> > pictures and can we use them for communication/press communications ?
> >
> > Some (personal) feedbacks from this edition of the battlemesh :
> >
> > *More people and coming from more locations. Digging for infos /
> > workshops / tutorials on mesh/wireless procotols/devices
> > *More talks and presentations (leading to less hands-on wireless
> > battle) to exchange on the different issues and works done by the
> > different communities
> > *Needs for more organizations on the deployment/tests parts (as usual)
> > and I propose 2 teams for next editions :
> > **configuration/flashing team (w/ a workshop right at the beginning of
> > the event for configuring the different protocols) ready to deploy the
> > 2nd day (needs for map of the location, flashing server)
> > **tests teams : working in advance preparing scripts, scenarii, VoIP
> > server, streaming server ready to be used once mesh-es deployed
> > ->screen showing the deployment and the different mesh nodes like
> > during the first one in Paris to follow the tests.
> > *Maybe dedicated workshops for more visibility on configuration of the
> > different protocols rather than some in-official meetings/school for
> > one protocol
> > *Presence of wifi hardware vendors, IETF people ? formal invitation earlier.
> >
> > I enjoyed this event again and want mesh everywhere now :)
> >
> > Xavi-massoud. (catalan nick for Xavier:)
> > PS : Albert, do you have the family pictures from the last day ?
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:08:02 +0100
> > From: Benjamin Henrion <bh at udev.org>
> > Subject: [Battlemesh] Subsignal podcast about WBMv4
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <AANLkTik0tmmxAwORDgKqvK6JkoGXj+zdTTkw_6zxoeHG at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > The podcast about WBMv4 is here:
> >
> > http://signal.hackerspaces.org/archive/2011-03-17-2200-dev-random.ogg
> >
> > --
> > Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
> > FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
> > "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
> > patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
> > Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
> > software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
> > court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
> > favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
> > democratically elected legislators."
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:55:07 +0100
> > From: "L. Aaron Kaplan" <aaron at lo-res.org>
> > Subject: [Battlemesh] Congratulations again for the great WBMv4!
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID: <8AF1EE55-B932-465F-8B51-3ED39869DFC8 at lo-res.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just wanted to express my big thanks to Roger and Albert for organizing such a great event!
> > While we did not get to testing protocols very much, it was nevertheless a great
> > experience to meet and talk with so many talented people in the field!
> >
> > Way to go! You set the mark very high for the next WBM :)
> >
> > Aaron.
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: PGP.sig
> > Type: application/pgp-signature
> > Size: 194 bytes
> > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> > URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/0452e53c/attachment-0001.pgp>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:08:33 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Ryan Hughes <ryan at iheartryan.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Some WMBv4 feedbacks
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103211007590.17935 at minime>
> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> >
> > > *Presence of wifi hardware vendors, IETF people ? formal invitation earlier.
> >
> > For my purposes, I was glad that this was a pretty commercial-free
> > environment. I got to hear frank and open reviews of the available
> > hardware.
> >
> > Of course, my purposes may be different from other people's. I don't have
> > a network yet and am trying to start it up. For people that have
> > networks already, they might want the vendors there, so that we can talk
> > to them about what we would like to see from their future hardware.
> > Particularly, we all would've benefited if hardware vendors were there to
> > hear the discussion of bufferbloat.
> >
> > That's my 0,02 Euros.
> >
> > --Ryan
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:37:58 +0100
> > From: "L. Aaron Kaplan" <aaron at lo-res.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Some WMBv4 feedbacks
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID: <A8F772D9-ED83-4A0B-A42C-38A60B83DB47 at lo-res.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> >
> > On Mar 21, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Xavier Carcelle wrote:
> >
> > > Querido battlemesh folks,
> > >
> > > Una mas : many thanks to the hosters of this WBMv4 and namely Roger
> > > and the guifi.net team for their hosting. Albert : thanks also for the
> > > pictures and can we use them for communication/press communications ?
> > >
> > > Some (personal) feedbacks from this edition of the battlemesh :
> > >
> > > *More people and coming from more locations. Digging for infos /
> > > workshops / tutorials on mesh/wireless procotols/devices
> > > *More talks and presentations (leading to less hands-on wireless
> > > battle) to exchange on the different issues and works done by the
> > > different communities
> > > *Needs for more organizations on the deployment/tests parts (as usual)
> > > and I propose 2 teams for next editions :
> > > **configuration/flashing team (w/ a workshop right at the beginning of
> > > the event for configuring the different protocols) ready to deploy the
> > > 2nd day (needs for map of the location, flashing server)
> > > **tests teams : working in advance preparing scripts, scenarii, VoIP
> > > server, streaming server ready to be used once mesh-es deployed
> > > ->screen showing the deployment and the different mesh nodes like
> > > during the first one in Paris to follow the tests.
> > > *Maybe dedicated workshops for more visibility on configuration of the
> > > different protocols rather than some in-official meetings/school for
> > > one protocol
> >
> > ACK to all above!
> >
> > > *Presence of wifi hardware vendors, IETF people ? formal invitation earlier.
> >
> > I will be at the IETF next week. If you want, I can describe the WBM
> > and invite people over to the next WBM.
> >
> > >
> > > I enjoyed this event again and want mesh everywhere now :)
> > >
> > hehe :)
> >
> > Yeah!
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: PGP.sig
> > Type: application/pgp-signature
> > Size: 194 bytes
> > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> > URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/e483e736/attachment-0001.pgp>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 7
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:14:10 +0100
> > From: Clauz <clauz at ninux.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Congratulations again for the great WBMv4!
> > To: battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > Message-ID: <4D878762.1020007 at ninux.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > On 03/21/2011 02:55 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Just wanted to express my big thanks to Roger and Albert for organizing such a great event!
> > > While we did not get to testing protocols very much, it was nevertheless a great
> > > experience to meet and talk with so many talented people in the field!
> > >
> > > Way to go! You set the mark very high for the next WBM :)
> >
> > Yes, thanks to all the guifi folks that hosted us, to Marek for taking
> > care of the agenda, to Pieter that drove a lot to pick up people, and
> > everybody else who worked in the shadow...
> >
> > I am really happy about this awesome international community that we
> > have been able to build!
> >
> > gracies,
> > Clauz
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: signature.asc
> > Type: application/pgp-signature
> > Size: 262 bytes
> > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> > URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/2fbcae98/attachment-0001.pgp>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:07:04 +0100
> > From: 44kbps <44kbps at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <AANLkTints7YC=jmmPSsVtRR6-WPEzWqqvSo-cU3-uwer at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > I was talking to his owner. He said to email to guifi.net mailist. Still no
> > response. I forgot to leave it on SBG and now a I is it on Olot.
> > In the other way I foget my two 220Vx6 on somewhere...
> >
> > On 2011 3 21 11:15, "Roger Baig Vi?as" <roger.baig at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Does anybody take care of giving this back to the owner?
> >
> > thx
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Andrew Parnell <andrew at parnell.ca> wrote:
> > > I have it here at Can ...
> > --
> > roger
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Battlemesh mailing list
> > Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > http...
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/125055ca/attachment-0001.htm>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 9
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:12:39 +0100
> > From: Albert Homs i Gall <alberthoms at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Battlemesh] Missed Lenovo's AC Adapter
> > To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <AANLkTinR012PxCC41kb=d-6BYO+aDgOrNXxx4pXLFSFG at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Yesterday during dinner talked to andrew to give the adapter to Pau, and
> > mailed the owner to coordinate with pau to get i back. After all the
> > messages I really don't know who has it :S. I will suppose tthat everything
> > is working like we said during the dinner
> >
> > 2011/3/21 44kbps <44kbps at gmail.com>
> >
> > > I was talking to his owner. He said to email to guifi.net mailist. Still
> > > no response. I forgot to leave it on SBG and now a I is it on Olot.
> > > In the other way I foget my two 220Vx6 on somewhere...
> > >
> > > On 2011 3 21 11:15, "Roger Baig Vi?as" <roger.baig at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anybody take care of giving this back to the owner?
> > >
> > > thx
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Andrew Parnell <andrew at parnell.ca> wrote:
> > > > I have it here at Can ...
> > > --
> > > roger
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Battlemesh mailing list
> > > Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > > http...
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Battlemesh mailing list
> > > Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> > >
> > >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110321/3a3f586f/attachment.htm>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Battlemesh mailing list
> > Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> >
> >
> > End of Battlemesh Digest, Vol 12, Issue 37
> > ******************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>

--
roger