[Battlemesh] Wireless Battle Mesh v5 - Next steps

[Pau]

>
> If routing protocol cannot run together with 5 others on Fonera for 100
> nodes then there is something wrong with this routing protocol.
>
It depends on what are you understanding for "run". If run for you is to be
able to make a ping with less than 50% of losses, then yes is works. But if
you understand run as a network where you can do layer7 tests, then you
cannot say they run.
There is several overhead and high cpu load using 5 mesh protocols at same
time, and fonera is not designed for that.


> I think a wiki/etherpad page would be enough for that? Just open a wiki,
> set deadlines for inital proposals and iterate a few times.
>
Ok, it can be enought. The only thing that we need is just start it.

--
./p4u



2011/9/22 Mitar <mitar at tnode.com>

> Hi!
>
> > We could start creating a new mailing list, something like:
> > wbm-firmware or wbm-work or whatever. And discuss there how to
> > organize it and what is needed for the next firmware.
>
> I think a wiki/etherpad page would be enough for that? Just open a wiki,
> set deadlines for inital proposals and iterate a few times.
>
> > I don't agree. I'm not saying just add more hardware. I'm speaking about
> "to
> > change" the actual hardware to a new one which let us more possiblities.
>
> If routing protocol cannot run together with 5 others on Fonera for 100
> nodes then there is something wrong with this routing protocol.
>
>
> Mitar
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20110922/2e18d143/attachment-0001.html>