[Battlemesh] Encryption on ad-hoc mode

[Mitar]

Hi!

Yes, it is different. But still, if it is unreliable in the context of
how it should work on the level it is, then I would like to know it. If
it is unreliable for something for what it is not even designed to do,
then I should also like to know it. :-)


Mitar

> I would say encryption on layer-2 and encryption on higher layers are
> doing different jobs... they are not equivalent.
> 
> Henning
> 
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Mitar <mitar at tnode.com> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>>> We just do it at a higher layer.
>>>
>>> So do we.  It seems to be more reliable, and it's a lot more flexible.
>>
>> Can you provide more details? Which higher layers? In which way it is
>> not reliable to do it on lower layers?
>>
>>
>> Mitar
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> 
> 
>