[Battlemesh] Battlemesh v6 conclusions

[Clauz]

Hi!
I'll try to reply inline.

On 07/29/2013 12:11 PM, Pau wrote:
> There are not "official" results, just raw data. As far as I know Nico
> and Clauz (the testing team) did some initial analisys, which pointed
> that BMX6 was the protocol with better results in general followed by
> OLSR in the bandwidth corner-to-corner test and Batman-adv in the time
> convergence test. But maybe they can clarify it.

Well, this, at least from my side, was just a sensation from looking at
the screen while the tests where performed, so it's not too fair to make
any big claim before having a real analysis done on the data.


> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Mitar <mitar at tnode.com
> <mailto:mitar at tnode.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi!
> 
>     Maybe I missed, but I cannot find any Battlemesh v6 conclusions/findings
>     anywhere?
> 
>     I found this page:
> 
>     http://www.battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV6/Tests
> 
>     But test data URL does not open for me:
> 
>     http://downloads.battlemesh.org/WBMv6/test_data/

Yes, it was down, it didn't survive the summer heatwave in Rome, but now
it should be up again. I also uploaded the data to github:
https://github.com/cl4u2/battlemeshv6_tests_postprocessing

>     But I would in fact be more interested in some nice plots and
>     conclusions based on them, not direct raw data. Has any such analysis
>     been done? So what is current status of comparisons between routing
>     protocols? Where could I learn more about that?

For battlemesh v6 the analysis hasn't been done yet.

cheers,
Clauz