[Battlemesh] FCC fw lockdown vs. GPLv3?
hrogge at gmail.com
Sat Sep 26 11:57:09 CEST 2015
And I think the consensus of the core kernel team is that the software
licence is the wrong place to fight about things like locked hardware.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Benjamin Henrion <zoobab at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Linus Lüssing
> <linus.luessing at c0d3.blue> wrote:
>> I'm wondering whether in the light of this FCC regulation it might
>> be possible to get a rough consenus from active kernel developers
>> that GPLv2 is not in the Linux developer's interest anymore.
> You would need the agreement of ALL the linux contributors to change
> the license, which is impossible.
> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
> democratically elected legislators."
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
More information about the Battlemesh