[Battlemesh] Proposal for battlemesh v10 "testbed"

Dave Taht dave.taht at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 16:50:28 CET 2016

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:35 AM, guifipedro <guifipedro at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, good workaround
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Gui Iribarren <gui at altermundi.net> wrote:
>> why not use those firmwares?
>> i.e. qMp, Gluon, LibreMesh, what else?
> vanilla OpenWrt
> vanilla LEDE
> wibed
> [more?]

"Mesh" is a big thing in eero and google this year... why not test
that too. (802.11s)
> we have to see if there is interest (people responsible) for all of
> these firmwares
>> So instead of fighting protocols we will have fighting firmwares.
> That way, we could have new/more system metrics on top of the typical
> about protocols, network
> - configuration complexity in terms of "configured device"
> (individual) and "configured network" (group)
>     - if automation tools are used. the approximate time to set up the
> automation is part of this configuration time :D
> - system reliability (packaging all together)
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh

Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!

More information about the Battlemesh mailing list