[Battlemesh] Chilling effect - Lockdown (FCC/EU)
Philipp Borgers
borgers at mi.fu-berlin.de
Thu Feb 18 10:52:20 CET 2016
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:27:50AM +0100, fboehm wrote:
> Am 17.02.2016 um 20:49 schrieb Adam Longwill:
> >Meta Mesh in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is going to be working on a blog
> >post which we will then shop to media outlets here in the US.
> >
> >That list you mentioned is exactly one of the things we'd like to put
> >together- but we'd sure like help compiling it if you're aware of
> >manufacturers doing this activity. I don't know if "shame" is the right
> >word, but technical people should be made aware of this "easy way out"
> >that the manufacturers are taking.
> >
> >Adam
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> ><jch at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr <mailto:jch at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>>
> >wrote:
> >
> > > New AC APs with lockdown from Ubiquiti:
> > >
> > >http://lists.prplfoundation.org/pipermail/fcc/2015-November/000462.html
> >
> > Grr.
> >
> > Is anyone working on compiling and publicising a list of
> > manufacturers who
> > do this kind of nonsense? The time may have come to start a grassroots
> > campaign to publicly shame manufacturers of DRM-encumbered routers.
> >
> > -- Juliusz
> > _______________________________________________
> > Battlemesh mailing list
> > Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org <mailto:Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org>
> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Battlemesh mailing list
> >Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> >http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> >
> What about manufacturers like www.8devices.com? They are working on 5GHz
> equipment currently and aren't focused on end-users. Therefore I assume no
> firmware lockdown.
Or https://www.open-mesh.com/
They support OpenWrt, BATMAN and free software in general [1].
> Why not buy from such companies and support them to produce more/better
> products for our needs. It doesn't seem to be rewarding to buy from the
> cheapest manufacturers and think that we have a stake in their decision
> making process. Who needs TP-Link?
Exactly!
But most community members perfer to think with the wallet and not the brain.
> I'm just trying to sketch a different attack vector to this problem.
So how do we implement the attack? Where do we attack first? At the brain?
> Franz
Best Philipp
[1] https://help.cloudtrax.com/hc/en-us/articles/202382890-Open-Mesh-development-information
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20160218/d6959140/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Battlemesh
mailing list