[Battlemesh] new tunneling vpn: wireguard
mitar at tnode.com
Wed Jun 29 15:58:53 CEST 2016
People who need encryption, why not use in-kernel l2tp tunnels + IPSec?
Why custom crypto implementation would be better?
>From our testing, for any reasonable crypto you need hardware support.
Do people know if any hardware chip is supported on any of those WiFi
routers by OpenWrt?
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:29:06PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>> I know people are using tunneldigger a lot, which bothers me....
>> has anyone played with:
> Yes, it's great :)
> I plan to release an OpenWRT package pretty soon .
> In my initial tests a few months ago, performance on small ar71xx routers
> was not so great, but still better than any comparable userspace VPN with
> encryption + integrity. Basically around 20 to 30 Mbit/s on a TL-WR841N.
> Performance may have improved since then, I will fire up my testbed again
> in a few weeks.
>  https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2016-June/000010.html
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
More information about the Battlemesh