[Battlemesh] Contact at Glinet?

[Christian Huldt]

Den 2016-03-09 kl. 11:24, skrev fboehm:
> Am 09.03.2016 um 10:32 schrieb Benjamin Henrion:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't find the email back in the archives, but someone here said he
>> had a contact at Glinet.
>>
>> Can you send me a private email, I would like to contact them for
>> suggesting them some improvements on their future boards/routers.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>
> I think this two persons ordered there. So maybe one of them is the
> one you are looking for:
>
> Christian Huldt <christian at solvare.se>
> Christopher Van Oort <CVanOort at thinix.com>
>
> By the way, wouldn't it be helpful to have a public description (in
> the Wiki) what the community is looking for in an ideal board?
>
> Including the specific use-case of course (like indoor NAT-Router or
> outdoor mesh-router)
>
> Like a wish-list to manufacturer :)
+1

But I believe it was more this (sorry for the excerpt) someone:

> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Adam Longwill
> <adam.longwill at metamesh.org <mailto:adam.longwill at metamesh.org>> wrote:
> I have actually started a conversation with GL-INET and they're being
> very supportive of building hardware for a market.
>
> Perhaps we could collectively come up with a set of general
> requirements for an ideal meshing node. 
>
> The hard part it seems is that the FCC certification process is
> complicated since they use OpenWRT on their routers.
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x82663443.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 1696 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20160309/eb1dac84/attachment-0003.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20160309/eb1dac84/attachment-0001.sig>