[Battlemesh] Special Regulatory Requirements at wbm10
zoobab at gmail.com
Tue Apr 4 21:38:20 CEST 2017
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Paul Fuxjaeger <paul.fuxjaeger at gmx.at> wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 22:22, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> Y’know, traditionally April Fools jokes are meant to be given before
> Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. Jokewriting is also not my thing - getting signups earlier was the main goal.
> On 01/04/2017 23:39, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>> I will bring my 2.4ghz jammer, which is very useful if you want to
>> test 2.4/5ghz mesh resiliancy.
> We could also generate valid weather radar signatures during #wbm10 (we've done something similar with our USRPN210+XCVR2450 in the lab before).
> Does somebody here have info on DFS?
> What's the current state of implementations (in ath9k/ath10k/mt76/...)?
> How big of a deal is it for 5GHz meshes today and in the future?
> If it's relevant enough for many we could use #wbm10 to also run some dedicated experiments on this. Or is this done elsewhere already?
BTW do you know if there trace we see there might be a 5ghz link?:
Just noticed that today checking the weather on meteo.be...
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."
More information about the Battlemesh