[Battlemesh] Special Regulatory Requirements at wbm10
fboehm at aon.at
Mon Apr 10 17:58:57 CEST 2017
Am 2017-04-10 um 17:28 schrieb Albert Rafetseder:
> Am 04/04/17 um 21:38 schrieb Benjamin Henrion:
>>> On 01/04/2017 23:39, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>>>> I will bring my 2.4ghz jammer, which is very useful if you want to
>>>> test 2.4/5ghz mesh resiliancy.
>>> We could also generate valid weather radar signatures during #wbm10 (we've done something similar with our USRPN210+XCVR2450 in the lab before).
>>> Does somebody here have info on DFS?
>>> What's the current state of implementations (in ath9k/ath10k/mt76/...)?
>>> How big of a deal is it for 5GHz meshes today and in the future?
>>> If it's relevant enough for many we could use #wbm10 to also run some dedicated experiments on this. Or is this done elsewhere already?
>> BTW do you know if there trace we see there might be a 5ghz link?:
>> Just noticed that today checking the weather on meteo.be...
> Looks plausible. Related figures to look at:
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
Here's also a nice picture showing 5GHz weather radar interference in
More information about the Battlemesh