[Ninux-Calabria] Ninux.org, isola Cosenza

[Giuseppe De Marco]

Tra il router e la nanobeam (10.87.7.250->10.87.7.254) ho le seguenti
performance

root a Capizzano_on_air:~# iperf -s -i br-lan
WARNING: interval too small, increasing from 0.00 to 0.5 seconds.
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  4] local 10.87.7.250 port 5001 connected with 10.87.7.1 port 48252
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0- 0.5 sec  6.71 MBytes   113 Mbits/sec
[  4]  0.5- 1.0 sec  6.51 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  1.0- 1.5 sec  6.48 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  1.5- 2.0 sec  6.41 MBytes   107 Mbits/sec
[  4]  2.0- 2.5 sec  6.47 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec
[  4]  2.5- 3.0 sec  6.51 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  3.0- 3.5 sec  6.50 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  3.5- 4.0 sec  6.44 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec
[  4]  4.0- 4.5 sec  6.49 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  4.5- 5.0 sec  6.48 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  5.0- 5.5 sec  6.49 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  5.5- 6.0 sec  6.46 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec
[  4]  6.0- 6.5 sec  6.49 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  6.5- 7.0 sec  6.50 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  7.0- 7.5 sec  6.49 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  7.5- 8.0 sec  6.43 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec
[  4]  8.0- 8.5 sec  6.50 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  8.5- 9.0 sec  6.48 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  9.0- 9.5 sec  6.49 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  9.5-10.0 sec  6.47 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec
[  4]  0.0-10.0 sec   130 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec


root a Capizzano_on_air:~# ping 10.87.7.254
PING 10.87.7.254 (10.87.7.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.929 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.618 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.596 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.577 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.605 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.569 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.559 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.553 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.7.254: seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.547 ms

sinceramente p2p mi aspetterei 0.23x ms !

di fatto su brodo ho performance migliori sulla beam

root a Brodolini:~# ping 10.87.22.254
PING 10.87.22.254 (10.87.22.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.87.22.254: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.507 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.22.254: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.385 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.22.254: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.376 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.22.254: seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.352 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.22.254: seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.355 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.22.254: seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.563 ms
64 bytes from 10.87.22.254: seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.375 ms

Mh, ci vorrà una ricablata :)


Il 10 settembre 2016 18:11, Luigi Porto <open.musk a gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
> Il giorno 10 settembre 2016 17:36, Giuseppe De Marco <demarcog83 a gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
>>
>> Ho appena sistemato la nanostation come AP su capizzanux (10.87.7.253,
>> manca l'upgrade del firmware).
>>
>> Se cerisano non riesce a linkare su di me sarebbe il caso di proporgli
>> di prendere una bella rocket così da fare solo punto di accesso, ci
>> penseremo poi noi a tirarlo dentro.
>>
>> con questa manovra mettiamo a posto le chiacchiere
>> G
>> _______________________________________________
>> Calabria mailing list
>> Calabria a ml.ninux.org
>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/calabria
>
>
> Cerisanux linkata su Capizzanux, sto per aggiornare il firmware della NSM5
> affinchè negozino al meglio MCS e valori.
>
> --
> #musk from calabria.ninux.org - CS
>
> @openmusk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Calabria mailing list
> Calabria a ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/calabria
>