[Battlemesh] Linksys promises not to block free firmware

Mitar mitar at tnode.com
Sat May 14 05:01:53 UTC 2016


Hi!

The best way to win is to go for a solution which works for both
fighting parties. Do we know of such a solution?


Mitar

> <IMHO>We should *not* work around these regulations but fight it. Tell
> your political representatives what you do and why you need to be able
> to run your "own" software on these devices.</IMHO> This is how I
> understood Max in the telco during WBM.
> 
> kind regards
> txt.file
> 
> On 14/05/16 03:37, Mitar wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> are you looking for a technical solution to a technical problem? or
>>> trying to find a technical solution for a fear?
>>
>> Oh, I completely agree that it is stupid, but this fact will not get us
>> anywhere. We have to create a solution ourselves and start pitching it
>> as the solution manufacturers should adopt, and this is it.
>>
>> I am also not claiming that no firmware ever. But let's make firmware
>> where it is at least as hard to disable that detection as it is on
>> current locked TP-links: so you need JTAG to bypass it.
>>
>> So, do we have a solution which protects from disabling that detection
>> with hardware tampering of the table?
>>
>>
>> Mitar
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> 

-- 
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m


More information about the Battlemesh mailing list