[Battlemesh] Linksys promises not to block free firmware

Ferry Huberts mailings at hupie.com
Sat May 14 08:00:30 UTC 2016


Yes: it's twofold:

1- big fines for people violating the 'do not send while radar is in 
operation'
2- big fat notifications and/or documentation in the software and/or UI 
that disabling radar detection violates law and opens you up for big fines.

keep it simple.

On 14/05/16 07:01, Mitar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The best way to win is to go for a solution which works for both
> fighting parties. Do we know of such a solution?
>
>
> Mitar
>
>> <IMHO>We should *not* work around these regulations but fight it. Tell
>> your political representatives what you do and why you need to be able
>> to run your "own" software on these devices.</IMHO> This is how I
>> understood Max in the telco during WBM.
>>
>> kind regards
>> txt.file
>>
>> On 14/05/16 03:37, Mitar wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> are you looking for a technical solution to a technical problem? or
>>>> trying to find a technical solution for a fear?
>>>
>>> Oh, I completely agree that it is stupid, but this fact will not get us
>>> anywhere. We have to create a solution ourselves and start pitching it
>>> as the solution manufacturers should adopt, and this is it.
>>>
>>> I am also not claiming that no firmware ever. But let's make firmware
>>> where it is at least as hard to disable that detection as it is on
>>> current locked TP-links: so you need JTAG to bypass it.
>>>
>>> So, do we have a solution which protects from disabling that detection
>>> with hardware tampering of the table?
>>>
>>>
>>> Mitar
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>>
>

-- 
Ferry Huberts


More information about the Battlemesh mailing list