[Battlemesh] Help needed presenting our mesh based app @ Battlemesh

Paul Gardner-Stephen paul.gardner.stephen at gmail.com
Mon Feb 28 23:31:40 CET 2011


Hello,

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:00 AM, shamsul hassan <shamsulbuddy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does somebody has tried to implement the OSLR over N900 or Neo Freerunner.
> I think thats pretty much feasible because of the below 2 reasons --
>
> 1) At least the Atheros based chipset in Neo can connect in Ad-hoc mode
> 2) Linux phone .. so you can install anything with the root access.
>
> I have worked pretty much with Neo Freerunner , but don't have it right now
> with me , so if somebody have that and is willing to bring in WBM4 .. that
> will be cool ..

We know that BATMAN can run on an N900 without trouble, so OSLR should
be no problem either.

Paul.

> Thanks
> Shamsul
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Paul Gardner-Stephen
> <paul.gardner.stephen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are happy to help in what ways we can.
>>
>> Currently we can get meshable Android phones in Australia for about 96
>> EUR network locked (which doesn't matter if you are using only WiFi).
>> We are happy to buy these and post them for people, as I think it is
>> about as cheap as anywhere in the world at present.
>>
>> We can also share our code and experience getting BATMAN and other fun
>> things running on Android.
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Mitar <mitar at tnode.com> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> I'll take this opportunity to speak a little on how we have things
>> >> working
>> >> at the moment. The current implementation works with the scenario
>> >> wherein
>> >> the mesh comprises of independent wireless devices in ad-hoc mode. The
>> >> OLSR daemon and our plugin,on each wireless device allows access to
>> >> devices multi-hops away.
>> >
>> > Access in which way? Plugin to what? For which devices?
>> >
>> >> What $500 and more importantly the gesture does is give us a lot of
>> >> encouragement and makes us feel extremely appreciative :) Thank you
>> >> so much for the thought :) At a  pure financial level it would still
>> >> require us to dig deep into our pockets and tap into money we've been
>> >> setting aside to do things like buy more hardware such as Android
>> >> devices to port this to and other such efforts to continue taking
>> >> this forward.
>> >
>> > This is an interesting line of thought I got now. There is a lot of
>> > development going on for Android devices in combination with mesh
>> > networks. And we all need hardware for that. To test things and so on.
>> > We could combine our efforts in this aspect and help each other by at
>> > least testing apps on different phones we all have and so on.
>> >
>> > For example Paul (I added him to CC) is working on a Serval project:
>> >
>> > http://www.servalproject.org/
>> >
>> > and they also need Android devices for development. And they are from
>> > Australia. ;-) So maybe you should get into the contact with him.
>> >
>> >
>> > Mitar
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>
>



More information about the Battlemesh mailing list