[Battlemesh] any (intermediary) results
Axel Neumann
neumann at cgws.de
Tue Mar 22 01:11:03 CET 2011
On Sonntag 20 März 2011, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:02 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan <aaron at lo-res.org> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Back home again (unfortunately). How is the situation at the WBMv4? Did
> > you manage to run any tests?
>
> Axel made some tests early this morning, with big pings, but we had to
> remove some nodes due to the raising moisture of the morning. The
> power supply we installed at the italian was also removed to close the
> door around 6am.
>
> No other TCP nor UDP transfers were made AFAIK.
>
> Maybe Axel can say more...
We did further tests.
Where is the recommended place to upload the approximately 50MB of data ?
More detailed:
In the afternoon, Boris and Henning redeploy the nodes that were collected the
previous night because of potential rain. They also put back the 3-channel-
switched fonera boards back to their old position. In the end we had 34 active
nodes in the mesh.
Another problem were the remaining nodes that still had the fixed 54MBit rate
option set.
IMHO this option only affects unicast transmissions and causes them to
essentially behaved like a black hole!
Because of this option, all our previous tests (pings and others unicast
measurements) were transmitted at 54MBit resulting in a much higher packet
loss than detected by our routing protocols (which are sending LinkQuality
probes based on broadcast/multicast and transmitted with 1 or 5MBit at most.
After reenabling the auto rate-selection, the measurements became much more
plausible. Also we were finally able to ping ALL 34 nodes in the mesh (some via
up to 5 hops and a round-trip packet loss of 80 %).
After that, Henning and me used a script to collect CPU, memory, protocol
overhead data and ping success rates to various destination nodes (one
destination node per measurement). We made a bunch of measurements, including
mobile scenarios. Some of the data could need some further post processing to
be better understandable but we already have some nice graphs and numbers.
Pau also wrote an interesting script measuring and visualizing latency and
ping success rates to ALL nodes and using ALL protcols (static-rotuing,
batman, babel, olsr, batman-adv, bmx6).
Monday morning at 8 o clock we went to bed, leavin Paus' script running until
the first people woke up and started to clean up everything.
/axel
>
> --
> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
> democratically elected legislators."
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
More information about the Battlemesh
mailing list