[Battlemesh] tests for downloads ? and tests follow-ups
Juliusz Chroboczek
jch at pps.jussieu.fr
Sat Mar 26 23:11:56 CET 2011
Interesting. Thanks to all of you for compiling this data.
Axel, could we have a histogram of the distribution of protocol packet
sizes?
A few comments, after staring at it for just a few minutes:
(1) I'm impressed by the good results of BMX6. Axel, is there
a detailed description of the protocol?
(2) No loops in Babel and BMX6, as expected. Some loops in BATMAN,
which I don't understand. Moderate number of loops in OLSR, as
expected. No data for BATMAN-adv.
(3) The issue with Babel having high protocol overhead in marginal
networks is still present, as expected. This is due to Babel sending
a bunch of explicit requests whenever it loses a route (Section 3.8.2.1
of RFC 6126); I'm considering a fix that would consist in rate-limiting
the requests, but I need to get the details right.
(4) Surprisingly low protocol overhead for OLSR. Counter-intuitively
enough, OLSR's strategy which consist in having no adaptative intervals
at all appears to pay off in this particular case.
(5) Although Babel was being run with a higher hello interval, its
performance in the mobility scenarios was as good or better than that of
the other protocols.
--Juliusz
More information about the Battlemesh
mailing list