[Battlemesh] Why 2.4Ghz?

Paul Gardner-Stephen paul at servalproject.org
Fri Nov 23 06:08:59 CET 2012


The Australian & New Zealand Standards have the same problem -- the
government sells exclusive distribution rights to some company for a
dime at some point, and as a result everyone is forced to pay a 2nd
time for what has already been tax-payer funded.

Very annoying.   Especially for AU&NZ standards which in some cases
you are legally obliged to follow.

Paul.

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ryan Hughes <ryan at iheartryan.com> wrote:
> Why would some individual company have exclusive access to fcc documents?
> The us government policy is usually that all of its documents are available
> to anyone, and in the public domain.
>
> --Ryan
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>
>> http://www.indiegogo.com/why2point4
>>
>> --
>> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
>> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
>> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
>> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
>> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
>> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
>> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
>> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
>> democratically elected legislators."
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh



More information about the Battlemesh mailing list