[Battlemesh] Battlemesh v6 conclusions

[NicoEchániz]

On 07/30/2013 06:58 AM, Pau wrote:
> 
> --
> ./p4u
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Clauz <clauz at ninux.org
> <mailto:clauz at ninux.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi!
>     I'll try to reply inline.
> 
>     On 07/29/2013 12:11 PM, Pau wrote:
>     > There are not "official" results, just raw data. As far as I know Nico
>     > and Clauz (the testing team) did some initial analisys, which pointed
>     > that BMX6 was the protocol with better results in general followed by
>     > OLSR in the bandwidth corner-to-corner test and Batman-adv in the time
>     > convergence test. But maybe they can clarify it.
> 
>     Well, this, at least from my side, was just a sensation from looking at
>     the screen while the tests where performed, so it's not too fair to make
>     any big claim before having a real analysis done on the data.
> 
> 
> Ok! However I remember Nico did some python script which already showed
> some results (at least in the bandwith test).

I pasted what I did that day here:

http://pastebin.com/DpktA56z


It was a hacky parse put together in a rush to try to have some averages
on the netperf tests.


If you run it on the collected data you will get something like this:

$ ./np_parse.py "netperf_test1/screenlog.netperf"
[['babel', 831.1666666666666, 3, 1641.43],
['batadv', 833.1899999999999, 7, 1146.91],
['bmx6', 2695.2912499999998, 8, 3945.15],
['olsr', 2918.0000000000005, 8, 3507.81]]

$ ./np_parse.py "netperf_test2/screenlog.netperf"
[['babel', 836.2333333333335, 3, 1216.47],
['batadv', 989.8333333333334, 3, 1148.42],
['bmx6', 2707.9880000000003, 5, 4644.81],
['olsr', 3647.4300000000003, 4, 4300.46]]

$ ./np_parse.py "netperf_test3/screenlog.netperf"
[['babel', 826.5674999999999, 4, 895.01],
['batadv', 402.7757142857144, 7, 590.57],
['bmx6', 1979.8442857142857, 7, 2788.54],
['olsr', 1866.6214285714286, 7, 3713.86]]


Each list is showing:
[protocol, average_throughput, samples, max_throughput]


Information on what was happening during each test should be somewhere
else :)



cheers!
Nico