[Battlemesh] battlemesh v6 test data postprocessing

[Dave Taht]

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Clauz <clauz at ninux.org> wrote:
> On 05/17/2014 11:41 AM, Clauz wrote:
>> On 05/16/2014 11:57 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>>>> During this battlemesh I would like to post-process the data from
>>>> Aalborg. I already produced some plots in the past days:
>>>
>>> Very strange results.  Are the pairs of nodes chosen the same for all
>>> the protocols?  Are the protocols running at the same time, or
>>> sequentially?
>>
>> The protocols were all running at the same time, but the tests were ran
>> sequentially. The pair of nodes was chosen randomly at each single test.
>> And, we didn't collect enough measurements to obtain the same set of
>> nodes for all the protocols.
>
> So, on Saturday I talked to Axel, who also did some postprocessing on
> WBMv6 data [*] and who asked me to double check.
>
> The script which has been used for all netperf tests is here:
> https://github.com/cl4u2/battlemeshv6_tests_postprocessing/blob/master/netperf_test2/scripts/netperf2.sh
>
> This can be also seen from the screenlogs, e.g.
> https://github.com/cl4u2/battlemeshv6_tests_postprocessing/blob/master/netperf_test2/data/screenlog.netperf
>
> So we had just one fixed source node and one fixed destination node all
> the time. All the protocols were running at the same time but the tests
> were ran in sequence.
>
> Sorry. This happens when you put your hands on stuff after one year,
> with bad documentation :(
>
> Juliusz, it would have been really super to have your advice and
> help during the last battlemesh events.
>
> I hope this year's postprocessing will be quicker and that the
> documentation will be better than WBMv6's.

Did you give netperf-wrapper a shot this year?

>
> Clauz
>
> [*] https://github.com/axn/wbm2pdf/blob/wbmv6/tex/wbmv6.pdf?raw=true
>
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh



-- 
Dave Täht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article