[Battlemesh] FCC talk update

[Simon Wunderlich]

Hi,

checked again. Basically, you should use:

http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/display

to submit a filing. The proceeding number is 15-170.

The current filings can be found here:

http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute;ECFSSESSION=3nr2V8QKjGWghGDngpFgf6TxvXqFDv94FM4Bz4SxQ6bD2f1BTbJb!-1954627099!-1292486409?proceeding=15-170

I've also found an e-mail address, although it might be better to use the 
filing than e-mailing the chairman ... From a private mail thread:


“Anyone interested should file public comments with the FCC in ET Docket 
No. 15-170 by August 16: 
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/proceeding/view?name=15-170 “

“You can also send emails directly to the chairman, Tom.Wheeler at fcc.gov” 
(There may be a better address)

Also please join the prpl foundation mailing list and let them know if you 
send something to get the avalanche started. :)

Cheers,
    Simon


On Friday 07 August 2015 06:09:33 ryan at iheartryan.com wrote:
> That problem seems to be intermittent.  I can get it sometimes, not
> others.  I was thinking of writing an email to the FCC, but instead of
> writing an email address on their website, they have a clever picture of
> an envelope, with the word "email"written under it.  It is a mailto: link
> with a subject line, but no actual email address.
> 
> I'm not sure the FCC is serious about accepting comments!
> 
> --Ryan
> 
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Jenny Ryan wrote:
> > That link doesn't work for me*. I spent half an hour yesterday after the
> > discussion searching for the electronic public comments form (via
> > fcc.gov/comments) and ran into a series of 404s.> 
> > >_<
> > 
> > Looping in sudomesh list in case anyone can help us battlemeshers find a
> > working public comments form (april?). Also a reminder that the deadline
> > for comments is August 16th; it would be good to get started on a
> > collective response asap! Adrian, juul, Pete, did any of you start
> > writing something or should I start a pad?
> > 
> > -jnny
> > 
> > * Not Found - The requested object does not exist on this server. The link
> > you followed is either outdated, inaccurate, or the server has been
> > instructed not to let you have it.
> > 
> > Jenny
> > 
> > Help open a people-powered common space in Oakland, California!
> > https://omnicommons.org/donate
> > 
> > `~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
> > "Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
> > -Laurie Anderson
> > 
> > "Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining
> > it."
> >  -Hannah Arendt
> > 
> > "To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
> > -Stéphane Mallarmé
> > ~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Simon Wunderlich <sw at simonwunderlich.de> 
wrote:
> >       Hmm, at least the main link and the filed documents still work (just
> >       checked today) - maybe there was a temporary problem?
> >       
> >       On Thursday 06 August 2015 21:47:48 Ben West wrote:
> >       > This link from the Government Printing Office (gpo) appears to
> >       > contain at
> >       > least some of the content of that proposed rule that now hides
> >       > behind a 404:
> >       > http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-08-06/html/2015-18402.htm
> >       > 
> >       > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Ben West <ben at gowasabi.net> wrote:
> >       > > Although the link to that FCC proceeding also appears in google
> >       > > searches,
> >       > > the fcc.gov link you're quoting is throwing a 404 error.
> >       > > 
> >       > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Simon Wunderlich
> >       > > <sw at simonwunderlich.de>
> >       > > 
> >       > > wrote:
> >       > >> Hi guys,
> >       > >> 
> >       > >> thanks a lot for the great discussion on the FCC topic today. I
> >       > >> didn't
> >       > >> hear
> >       > >> about a mailing list specific on this topic yet, but I'll
> >       > >> follow up as
> >       > >> soon as
> >       > >> I do.
> >       > >> 
> >       > >> In the meantime, here is the FCC public filing link I meant:
> >       > >> 
> >       > >> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/proceeding/view?name=15-170
> >       > >> 
> >       > >> As I already said, the topic is actually about something else
> >       > >> but there
> >       > >> are
> >       > >> other people complaining about the lock-down, so please go
> >       > >> ahead and send
> >       > >> them
> >       > >> lots of e-mails ASAP!!
> >       > >> 
> >       > >> Also the slides are updated to the Agenda ....
> >       > >> 
> >       > >> Cheers,
> >       > >>
> >       > >>     Simon
> >       > >>
> >       > >> _______________________________________________
> >       > >> Battlemesh mailing list
> >       > >> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> >       > >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> >       > > 
> >       > > --
> >       > > Ben West
> >       > > http://gowasabi.net
> >       > > ben at gowasabi.net
> >       > > 314-246-9434
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Battlemesh mailing list
> > Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20150807/860a1ef5/attachment-0001.sig>