[Battlemesh] WBMv8 -- a personal perspective

Henning Rogge hrogge at gmail.com
Mon Aug 10 15:51:32 CEST 2015


I already talked with a few people of the batman-adv team and I think
I can make a suggestion of a configuration that will work for
IP-routing and Batman-Advanced in the next few days.


On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, nemesis <nemesis at ninux.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:13:24 +0200, nemesis <nemesis at ninux.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 22:01:33 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek
>> <jch at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> [...]
>> I would also encourage more participation of ALL the routing protocol
>> developers, because in my opinion the batman-adv team did not follow
>> the process as much as the other routing protocol developers.
> Clarifying as this could be a potential flame starter.
> I chatted with It's not really true that the batman-adv people did not
> follow, there was a lack of clear communication so they were more focused on
> the wibed testbed.
> The solution in my opinion is to get part of the configurations before the
> event and have them approved by routing devs.
> Fed
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh

More information about the Battlemesh mailing list