[Battlemesh] Result documentation RFC

[Benjamin Henrion]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Nemesis <nemesis at ninux.org> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> this is a request for feedback: comments, suggestions and pull requests.
>
> See here:
> http://battlemesh-test-docs.readthedocs.org/v8/index.html
>
> Before starting to work on it I exchanged a few ideas via chat with Amadeus
> and Henning.
>
> Here's a quick recap:
>
> having all the results on one page would have made it quite hard to read
> so the tests have been split in 3 pages
>
> mesh of adversity: one single stream from client (connected to A) to server
> (connected to K)
>
> reboot
> ping
> ping + iperf
>
> crossed streams jeopardy: two streams, client A to server K and node D to
> node H
>
> 10 mbit iperf streams
> 100 mbit iperf streams
>
> blowing up the network: tests performed with Flent by Toke
>
> Realtime Response Under Load (RRUL)
> Realtime Response Under Load Best Effort (RRUL_BE)
> 8-stream download test
> TCP upload
> TCP download
>
> As you can see, there are quite a few things that can be improved!
>
> some graphs are missing (some purposely and some I was not able to generate
> properly)
> english needs to be checked
> it would be good to provide some additional explanation to the graphs
> shall we add a conclusion section to each page? if yes, anybody willing to
> propose a conclusion?
> shall we add a last "lessons learned" page with all the things that went
> wrong and the proposed solutions for the next edition?

>From what I have heard in the videos, none of the routing protocols
resists network saturation.

Maybe adding a QOS rule for packets belonging to routing protocols would help?

-- 
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."