[Battlemesh] New name for the Battlemesh?

Moritz Warning moritzwarning at web.de
Sun Feb 2 19:09:41 CET 2020


If there is a "good" alternative name. Battle might not be fitting anymore (less battle at the battlemesh) and it might be misleading (=> military).
Any ideas?

On 2/2/20 6:55 PM, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hm, what do others think, should we maybe use this political
> development as a reason to change the name of the Battlemesh?
>
> Regards, Linus
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 02:37:47PM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
>> An update on the political side:
>>
>> https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-107/
>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2020/02/01/land-mines-trump/
>> https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/01/31/us-trump-administration-abandons-landmine-ban
>> https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/usa-donald-trump-gibt-landminen-wieder-fuer-das-us-militaer-frei-a-c65f5160-9894-4e73-a566-b87d61955f2e
>>
>> - 164 countries banned anti-personel mines
>>   (Ottawa Treaty [0]; e.g. USA, Russia, China, India did not sign it)
>> - 2014 the Obama administratiton had limited the use of anti-personel
>>   mines to betweeen South- and North Korea
>> - Last Friday, Trump administration abandoned this for
>>   "advanced, non-persistent landmines"
>>
>> [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa_Treaty
>>
>> https://twitter.com/hrw/status/1223352270949175297
>> https://twitter.com/marywareham/status/1223350274217140224
>> https://twitter.com/marywareham/status/1223359126652309505
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 02:52:23PM +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>>> Souvenir from WBMv4 in Vic:
>>>
>>> https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2019/07/12/army-researchers-building-smart-landmines-for-future-combat/
>>>
>>> --
>>> Benjamin Henrion (zoobab)
>>> Email: zoobab at gmail.com
>>> Mobile: +32-484-566109
>>> Web: http://www.zoobab.com
>>> FFII.org Brussels
>>> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
>>> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
>>> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
>>> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
>>> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
>>> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
>>> democratically elected legislators."
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Battlemesh mailing list
>>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>>> https://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> https://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> https://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>


More information about the Battlemesh mailing list