[Battlemesh] Mesh Routing Protocol Comparison
dave.taht at gmail.com
Fri May 1 18:27:53 CEST 2020
I keep hoping y'all will actually test networks like this under load,
rather than idle.
The flent rrul test is always a good start, and the rtt_fair tests in
particular, let you exercise multiple nodes on the network. Monitoring
convergence time under that kind of repeatable load, is quite
also you should update to babel 1.9.2 and fiddle with the unicast mode.
You can have even more fun with my infamous "rtod" tool (
https://github.com/dtaht/rtod ). If you are at all like me, it's
really exciting to see what happens when you put more than 1000+
routes on the network (mostly ipv6). I don't know what actually
happens with all these other routing protocols, but then again, I was
always the kind of kid that tossed lithium in water or aimed bottle
rockets at my friends...
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:17 AM Moritz Warning <moritzwarning at web.de> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I wrote a virtual test setup that supports multiple mesh routing protocols and produces nice graphs.
> The whole setup is based on Linux network namespaces:
> So far, there are some preliminary results with a focus on convergence, mobility and scalability.
> Keep in mind that these results are not "final" yet, as hardware limitations and pathological behavior play a dominat factor in some of the results.
> I hope to be able to present the refined results at the next Battlemesh and have a lively discussion!
> Btw.: if you happen to have beefy server with good CPU/IO speed - let me know.
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
Make Music, Not War
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
More information about the Battlemesh