[Ninux-Wireless] Fwd: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode?

[Antonio Anselmi]

piu' che ath9k sembra un problema ath9k + hostap.... stiamo a vedere come
evolvono le cose.



2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurco89 a gmail.com>

> si ho gia' aperto un bug da tempo per il VAP
>
> ma sembra che al momento e' proprio al modalita' AP che ha bisogno di
> essere stabilizzata su ath9k dopo di che probabilmente aggiusteranno
> anche i VAP
>
> 2011/3/23 Antonio Anselmi <tony.anselmi a gmail.com>:
> > funziona su M5... quello che manca e' la possibilita' di avere un
> simultaneo
> > VAP in managed :(
> >
> >
> > 2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurco89 a gmail.com>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Ben West <westbywest a gmail.com>
> >> Date: 2011/3/22
> >> Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on
> >> Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode?
> >> To: "Daniel A. Nagy" <nagydani a epointsystem.org>
> >> Cc: olsr-users a lists.olsr.org
> >>
> >>
> >> For an update, I believe I was able to get HT modes working in IBSS
> >> (aka adhoc) on two Nanostation M5s.  The Links reported 150Mbit/s
> >> connection on both ends after settling, and throughput measured at
> >> 45Mbit/s.
> >> This required patches to iw and compat-wireless on OpenWRT r25206.
> >> More info here:
> >> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=131299#p131299
> >> I would be interested to hear if anyone has been able to specify HT
> >> modes in /etc/config/wireless on OpenWRT, since I was unable.
> >> Note that the link speeds did suggest I was getting multiple chains
> >> (i.e. MIMO) very briefly.  My test environment (indoor room, 20feet
> >> separation) could have been non-ideal.
> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Ben West <me a benwest.name> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for not explaining this in the original post.  It is described
> in
> >> > OpenWRT forum post; I had snipped my question to this list to focus on
> >> > mesh-related question.
> >> > Gateway: Rocket M5, flashed with pre-compiled
> >> > openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-rocket-m-squashfs-factory.bin for Backfire
> 10.03-rc4
> >> > Repeaters (and a backup gwy): Nanostation M5, flashed with
> >> > custom-compiled pre-compiled
> openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-factory.bin
> >> > from Backfire r24045, and with this patch to allow DHCP on 2nd LAN
> port:
> >> > http://freifunk.net/pipermail/wlanware/2010-December/002439.html
> >> > Basically, I'm curious to hear details (e.g. patches, what revision of
> >> > OpenWRT/ath9k) where people have confirmed getting HT modes to work.
> >> > Besides that, these nodes are actually working just fine, and their
> link
> >> > speed generally outpaces the uplink I have for them anyway.  It's just
> that
> >> > I would like to support ~40Mbit link speed in the intermediate future,
> >> > should a fast enough uplink appear.
> >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Daniel A. Nagy
> >> > <nagydani a epointsystem.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 03/14/2011 06:10 AM, Ben West wrote:
> >> >> > I just set up 3 Ubiquiti M5 devices as mesh nodes running OpenWRT
> >> >>
> >> >> Since Ubiquiti M5 devices are not as identical as the pre-M series,
> >> >> could you be more specific?
> >> >>
> >> >> These three categories are quite distinct, require different firmware
> >> >> and have their own, distinct quirks:
> >> >> - PicoStation / Bullet M5
> >> >> - NanoStation M5
> >> >> - NanoStation M5 Loco
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Daniel
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Olsr-users mailing list
> >> >> Olsr-users a lists.olsr.org
> >> >> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ben West
> >> westbywest a gmail.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> Olsr-users mailing list
> >> Olsr-users a lists.olsr.org
> >> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wireless mailing list
> >> Wireless a ml.ninux.org
> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >
>
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
URL: <http://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/wireless/attachments/20110323/f8b98762/attachment-0001.html>