[Battlemesh] Proposal for battlemesh v10 "testbed"

Benjamin Henrion zoobab at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 14:00:21 CET 2016

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Pau <pau at dabax.net> wrote:
> So instead of fighting protocols we will have fighting firmwares. There
> will be many different things among the tests (each firmware might
> include a different set of linklayer+routing+apps) that the comparison
> among the routing protocol would not be necessary comparable.
> In any case, I find it a good idea. What we learned on last WBM is that
> there is not a big interest on comparing protocols among the
> participants of the event. So maybe comparing firmwares would be more
> interesting.

Another solution would be to invest in a permanent testbed somewhere.

Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."

More information about the Battlemesh mailing list