[Battlemesh] Mesh Routing Protocol Comparison

[Pedro]

What about this?

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-Xeon-X5687-vs-Intel-Xeon-E5-2690-v3/1313vs2364

contact me privately and we see

On 5/4/20 1:20 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
> Something faster as this 10 year old Xeon:
>
> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+X5687+%40+3.60GHz
>
> batman-adv also needs a high single core performance, because it runs in the Kernel.
> The CPU usage is very low most of the time, but data points involving hundreds of nodes need a lot of CPU.
>
> On 5/4/20 12:57 PM, Pedro wrote:
>> Moritz, what specs do you need?
>>
>> On 5/3/20 10:42 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
>>> I have added a test that kind of replicates Freifunk networks (without mobility, they do not move that much in reality).
>>> But I do not have hardware capable of running those. Maybe I should get some AWS machine for a few days. :-)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Battlemesh mailing list
>> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
>> https://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Battlemesh mailing list
> Battlemesh at ml.ninux.org
> https://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/battlemesh

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x9D64597C3A982DCA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 945 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20200504/ce0658ca/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://ml.ninux.org/pipermail/battlemesh/attachments/20200504/ce0658ca/attachment.sig>